Appeal No. 1999-0929 Application No. 08/514,986 are intended to be part of the detecting device seen in Figure 15a of the patent, we note that the means for coupling the second electrical conductor to the first electrical conductor in the Figure 15a embodiment of Matsui would then constitute the elements 96, 96’, 97, 98 and 99, with such elements retaining the first (95) and second (95’) electrical conductors parallel and substantially co-extensive to one another to form a sensor assembly and insulating said second electrical conductor from said first electrical conductor. As for appellants’ assertion that the "sensor assembly" as defined in claim 17 on appeal does not include elements that provide mechanical support for the electrical conductors as they extend across the one free, unrestrained span set forth in the claim, we point out that claim 17 is drafted using a "comprising" format and therefore does not exclude the presence of other elements, such as elements (98, 99) of Matsui, being part of the "sensor assembly" and providing a degree of mechanical support for the sensor assembly as it spans the distance between the two spaced apart positions set forth in claim 17. Thus, the mere fact that the sensor 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007