Appeal No. 1999-0929 Application No. 08/514,986 that Matsui does not include coupling means as set forth in claim 17 as there is no element which both couples strips (95, 95’) together and insulates one from the other. In response, we first observe that appellants did not argue this aspect of the claimed subject matter (i.e., the "means for coupling" portion of claim 17) in their Main Brief, and that such a new argument in a request for rehearing would normally not be 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007