Ex parte BREED et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0929                                                        
          Application No. 08/514,986                                                  


          that Matsui does not include coupling means as set forth in                 
          claim 17 as there is no element which both couples strips (95,              
          95’) together and insulates one from the other.                             


          In response, we first observe that appellants did not                       
          argue this aspect of the claimed subject matter (i.e., the                  
          "means for coupling" portion of claim 17) in their Main Brief,              
          and that such a new argument in a request for rehearing would               
          normally not be                                                             





















                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007