THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID C. MAY, SITHYA S. KHIEU, CRISTINA U. THOMAS, WARREN J. JOHNSON,
RONALD W. GERDES and DAVID J. LANDON
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0941
Application No. 08/756,4241
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 31-44, 49 and 50. The
examiner has indicated claims 64-67 as allowable and has objected to claims 45-48 as being
Application for patent filed November 26, 1996. According to appellants, the application is a continuation1
of application No. 08/445,285, filed May 19, 1995, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007