Appeal No. 1999-1478 Application 08/742,327 portion of the main shaft being nitride treated, said portion of the main shaft beginning at but not including the gear center hold down threads to and including the yoke end and the tapered yoke end of the main shaft, and the tapered yoke end having a dry film lubricant applied thereon. The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Connard 3,344,817 Oct. 3, 1967 Itoh et al. (Itoh) 5,215,823 Jun. 1, 1993 Also relied upon is appellants’ admitted prior art (pages 1-3). Appellants’ admitted prior art includes a coal pulverizer 2 with a yoke 12, a horizontal pinion shaft 16 and a main shaft 14, the main shaft 14 including a yoke end 20 at one end of the main shaft 14 with the yoke end 20 including a tapered yoke end 25 at a distal end thereof, the tapered yoke end 25 of the main shaft 14 terminating with a threaded portion 26, the main shaft 14 further including gear center hold down threads 24 dividing the yoke end 20 from the other end of the main shaft 14.3 3 It is noted that the specification of the present application refers to the main shaft using two different 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007