Appeal No. 1999-1478 Application 08/742,327 pulverizer like that shown in the admitted prior art. Accordingly, again we refuse to sustain the examiner rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). In view of the foregoing, the examiner’s decision rejecting claim 1, and claims 3-5 and 10-12 which depend therefrom, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007