Ex parte SANO et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1999-1778                                                        
          Application No. 08/888,365                                                  



          in the subject matter of claim 1.  In this regard, even looking             
          at Booth in a light most favorable to the examiner, that is, as             
          showing that it is generally known in the heat exchanger art to             
          provide internally ribbed heat exchanger tubes with asymmetrical            
          fins, the rejection is not sustainable.  This is so because, as             
          best, Booth would have suggested that one of Fujimoto’s internal            
          formations, either the convex portions (6) or the fins (7),                 
          might be asymmetrical.  In contrast, claim 1 calls for both the             
          convex portion and the fins to be asymmetrical.                             




















                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007