Appeal No. 1999-1778 Application No. 08/888,365 in the subject matter of claim 1. In this regard, even looking at Booth in a light most favorable to the examiner, that is, as showing that it is generally known in the heat exchanger art to provide internally ribbed heat exchanger tubes with asymmetrical fins, the rejection is not sustainable. This is so because, as best, Booth would have suggested that one of Fujimoto’s internal formations, either the convex portions (6) or the fins (7), might be asymmetrical. In contrast, claim 1 calls for both the convex portion and the fins to be asymmetrical. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007