THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRIEDRICH KNAPP
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1904
Application No. 08/704,778
____________
HEARD: June 6, 2000
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 25-31, 34-36
and 39-49. Claim 50 stands allowed and claims 32, 33 and 38 stand objected to as being
dependent from a rejected base claim. Claim 37 was canceled subsequent to the final rejection
(see Paper Nos. 12 and 13). No other claims remain pending.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007