Appeal No. 1999-2132 Page 8 Application No. 08/672,856 arcuate path and, thus, was old and well known at the time of the invention. The examiner then concludes (answer, page 4) that it would have been obvious to duplicate the Tekavec upper and lower drive rollers and provide for an upper and a lower series of drive rollers along the Tekavec arcuate discharge path, in order to improve the reliability of the Tekavec transfer device (1) in view of Mistyurik’s teachings and (2) since it has been held that mere duplication of essential working parts involves only routine skill in the art.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007