Ex parte SIMMONS et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1999-2132                                       Page 8           
          Application No. 08/672,856                                                  


               arcuate path and, thus, was old and well known at the                  
               time of the invention.                                                 

               The examiner then concludes (answer, page 4) that it                   
          would have been obvious to duplicate the Tekavec upper and                  
          lower drive rollers and provide for an upper and a lower                    
          series of drive rollers along the Tekavec arcuate discharge                 
          path, in order to improve the reliability of the Tekavec                    
          transfer device (1) in view of Mistyurik’s teachings and (2)                
          since it has been held that mere duplication of essential                   
          working parts involves only routine skill in the art.                       


























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007