Appeal No. 1999-2186
Application No. 08/857,571
Accordingly, the rejection will be sustained.
Conclusion
The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 to
14, 16 to 19 and 21 to 48 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed,
and his decision to reject claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 to 14, 17, 21
to 24, 26 to 30 and 32 on the ground of obviousness-type
double patenting is affirmed.
13
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007