Interference 102,413 Page 35
Pitha v. Muller
ORDER
Upon consideration of the record of this interference, it
is—
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 3 is
awarded against junior party PITHA;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party PITHA is not entitled
to a patent containing claims 1-28, which correspond to Count
3;
FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,
senior party MULLER is entitled to a patent containing claims
1-11 and 22-36 which correspond to Count 3;
RICHARD E. SCHAFER
Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF
PATENT
RICHARD TORCZON
APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge
INTERFERENCE
S
JEFFREY T. SMITH
Administrative Patent Judge
Page: Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007