Interference No. 104,241 does not establish the identity of what compound was actually produced by Jeon or independently corroborate the statements made on Jeon's notebook page but only serves to establish that the notebook page existed on a certain date, allegedly prior to December 17, 1993. Hahn v. Wong, 892 F.2d at 1032, 13 USPQ2d at 1317. In reaching this conclusion, we have not overlooked Jeon et al.'s argument that the "representation of a Thin Layer Chromatography ("TLC") result represented by the rectangle on the left-hand side of the page) which was performed immediately after the synthesis scheme" proves a pure product was obtained (page 2 of Yoon T. Jeon's declaration filed as part of Paper Number 3 in this interference). Neither have we overlooked the fact that in Dhar's declaration Dhar has declared that: I observed the synthesis of the compound by Yoon T. Jeon. The date on which the synthesis took place is prior to December 17, 1993, although the date has been redacted from the copy of the notebook page. Nonetheless, the "representation of a Thin Layer Chromatography" on the laboratory notebook page does not identify the structure for the pure product allegedly obtained. 28Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007