KIEL et al. V. GRAHAM et al. - Page 4




          Interference No. 104,352                                                    
          Kiel v. Graham                                                              

                         Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.666(a),                            
                    enclosed herewith is a copy of an executed                        
                    settlement agreement which settles all                            
                    outstanding matters in the present                                
                    interference.                                                     
                    Paper No. 106 (By Graham) -- “Graham Withdrawal                   
               of Papers” in which it is stated:                                      
                         In view of the settlement of the                             
                    present Interference between the parties,                         
                    Graham hereby withdraws each of its motions                       
                    (including Graham Preliminary Motions 1-3                         
                    and Graham Motion Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.635                         
                    of January 27, 2000) with the exception of                        
                    Graham Motion for Correction of                                   
                    Inventorship.  In addition, Graham hereby                         
                    withdraws Graham Opposition to Corrected                          
                    Kiel Motion 2.  (Emphasis in original.)                           
                    Paper No. 104 (By Kiel) -- “Kiel Withdrawal of                    
               Corrected Kiel Motion 1" in which it is stated that                    
               Kiel withdraws its corrected preliminary motion 1.                     
               It is evident that the parties are attempting to                       
          implement the procedure suggested by the administrative patent              
          judge.  We presume that party Kiel has no objection to our                  
          entering judgment against party Graham without prejudice to                 
          Graham’s subsequently amending its claims or presenting                     
          rebuttal evidence before the examiner.                                      
               The only motions now remaining pending are: (1) Kiel’s                 
          preliminary motion 2, and (2) Graham’s motion to correct                    
          inventorship.  Both are unopposed.                                          

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007