Interference No. 104,352
Kiel v. Graham
FURTHER ORDERED that party Graham’s unopposed motion to
correct inventorship is dismissed, without prejudice to re-
filing the same before the examiner; and
FURTHER ORDERED that in further ex parte prosecution
before the examiner, the senior party shall bring to the
examiner’s attention (1) pages 15-20 of our show cause order
dated March 8, 2000 (Paper No. 81) in which we discussed the
unpatentability of Graham’s claims 37-45 over the sales
catalogue; (2) Kiel’s corrected preliminary motion 1 [now
withdrawn] (Paper Nos. 38 and 50) and reply (Paper No. 62) to
Graham’s opposition; and (3) Graham’s preliminary motion 1
[now withdrawn] (Paper No. 36) and reply (Paper No. 65) to
Kiel’s opposition.
)
FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
) APPEALS
RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) AND
Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES
)
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007