Interference 102,413 Page 23 Pitha v. Muller personal knowledge of the properties products produced in experiments W-14 and W-17 at the time of their production. Pitha argues the literature confirms the intrinsically amorphous nature of HPBCD and PBCD. Specifically, Pitha cites exhibits PX-41 published September 1985, PX-54 published February 1986 and MCX-4 published October 1987. These 38 exhibits were all published after April 25, 1984, which is after the accorded benefit date of Pitha. Consequently, the articles are not available to establish Pitha’s appreciation of the properties of HPBCD and PBCD as of the time the experiments were performed. For the above reasons, and because proof of the existence of a physical embodiment within the scope of the count has not been shown, we cannot rely on the experimental evidentiary data which includes the products described in Dr. Ciesielski’s laboratory notebook, PX-27, as evidence of an actual reduction to practice. This includes Dr. Czajkowska experiments C-160, C-161, C-162, C-166, C-170, C-171, C-172, C-173, C-174, C-207, C-231, C-250, C-252, C-253, C-254, C-256, C-258, C-259, C-260, 38PB page 14, lines 8-19, page 15, lines 23-25 and page 16, lines 17-21.Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007