ELLIS et al. vs. HENRY - Page 17



          Interference No. 103,414                                                   


                    fact that the rivet which Southco had earlier                    
                    supplied to Unistrut was specified to have a                     
                    maximum grip of .356", which corresponds only                    
                    to one tube and one fitting of the Telestrut                     
                    system, and Unistrut was attempting to use                       
                    the rivets to connect two tubes plus one                         
                    fitting.  In paragraph two of Mr. Vickers'                       
                    letter he advised Mr. O'Rourke of his                            
                    conception of providing an additional step on                    
                    the shank[,] producing a three-stage rivet,                      
                    which would work to reduce the driving force                     
                    when installed through all three layers, and                     
                    thus satisfy each of the three conditions set                    
                    out in Mr. Wright's June 9, 1992 letter                          
                    (Ellis “Exhibit 2").  Mr. Vickers' reference                     
                    in his letter to “all three layers” refers to                    
                    the condition in which the rivets would                          
                    connect two tubes plus one fitting,                              
                    corresponding to condition number 3 in Mr.                       
                    Wright's June 9, 1992 letter.  Mr. Vickers                       
                    advised Mr. O'Rourke that samples would be                       
                    sent to Mr. O'Rourke by June 17, 1992.                           
                    (O'Rourke, ER 2:18-3:5 and Vickers, ER 13:1-                     
                    20).                                                             
                    8.  On or about June 11, 1992, Mr. Ellis                         
                    prepared a first handwritten drawing of a                        
                    three-stage rivet, which is identified as                        
                    “Ellis Exhibit 12.”  In this drawing, the                        
                    diameter of the third stage at the end of the                    
                    shank is shown as being .468”, and the                           
                    distance from the top of the third stage to                      
                    the under side of the rivet head is shown as                     
                    being .408”.  Mr. Ellis' notation that                           
                    [reads] “need Fri 12 June” refers to the date                    
                    in which samples based on this drawing were                      
                    needed. (Ellis, ER 6:14-21).                                     
                    9.  On or about June 12, 1992, Mr. Ellis                         
                    prepared a second handwritten drawing of a                       
                    three-stage rivet, which is identified as                        
                    “Ellis Exhibit 13.”  The drawing shown in                        
                    Ellis Exhibit 13 is a modification of that                       
                    shown in Ellis Exhibit 12 in that the                            
                    diameter of the third stage was changed to                       
                    .437" and the distance from the top of the                       
                    third stage to the under side of the rivet                       
                    head was changed to .380”.  Mr. Ellis'                           
                    handwritten note “need 6/15 Mon” again refers                    
                    to the date that samples were needed (Ellis,                     
                    ER 6:22-7:6).                                                    
                                        App. 4                                       



Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007