Interference No. 103,414 revised an earlier blue print drawing to reflect Mr. Ellis' modification, which Mr. Koza completed on October 7, 1992. Mr. Koza's blue print drawing is identified as “Ellis Exhibit 18”. Mr. Koza then forwarded this drawing to Mr. Rayne that same day, which is identified as “Ellis Exhibit 4”. (Koza, ER 20:9-21:1). 19. On October 5, 1992, Mr. Ellis sent an in-house correspondence to Mr. Vickers to have a work order issued based on the drawings of the partially tapered shank that Mr. Ellis had prepared. Mr. Ellis' handwritten in-house correspondence to Mr. Vickers is identified as “Ellis Exhibit 16”. (Ellis, ER 9:17-21). 20. On October 5, 1992, Mr. O'Rourke received a faxed message from Mr. Wright of Unistrut asking for a revised quotation on the tapered rivet for volume purchasing, indicating that Unistrut was satisfied with the product, which is identified as “Ellis Exhibit 5". Mr. O'Rourke forwarded the request to Southco on October 6, 1992[,] which is identified as “Ellis Exhibit 6”. (O'Rourke, ER 3:16-21). 21. On October 6, 1992, Mr. Rayne received the memorandum from Mr. O'Rourke, requesting a Southco drawing as well as an updated quote for Unistrut if there is a cost difference in the tapered rivet design. (Rayne, ER 18:3- 7). 22. On October 8, 1992, Mr. Rayne sent a revised quote together with a revised drawing in relation to the tapered rivet design to Mr. Wright at Unistrut. Copies of the revised quote and drawing are identified respectively as “Ellis Exhibits 17 and 18”. The revised drawing of the tapered rivet was prepared by Mr. Roza based on the information from Mr. Ellis. (Rayne, ER 18:8-15). 23. On November 17, 1992, Mr. O'Rourke received a telephone order from Unistrut, which Mr. O'Rourke believes was from Mr. Wright, for 50,000 of the tapered rivets. Mr. O'Rourke's handwritten memorandum of that App. 8Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007