THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte RICHARD S. MUKA _____________ Appeal No. 1999-2335 Application 08/449,8091 ______________ REHEARING _______________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent2 Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This case comes before us again on request by the appellant for rehearing of our decision of August 31, 1999, 1Application for patent filed May 24, 1995. 2Judge Frankfort was designated to this panel for the rehearing in place of Judge Meister, who has retired. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007