The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 76
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROY D. SEEL
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2021
Application No. 08/500,231
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
In a paper filed September 20, 2000, appellant requests
that we reconsider or rehear our decision dated March 22,
2000, where- in we sustained the rejection of claims 21
through 24, 26 through 28, 30 and 31 under the public use
clause of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The application file reveals
that subsequent to our earlier decision in March, appellant
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007