Appeal No. 1997-2021
Application No. 08/500,231
way
mirror feature of the claimed invention. We required proper,
additional declarations from the three earlier noted
individuals subsequent to our earlier decision on appeal to
obviate any sub-
issue with respect to the special considerations as well as
the assertion of private experimental use also discussed at
the bottom of page 6 of our last decision in Appeal No. 94-
1463 to which we made specific reference and incorporated by
reference into our original opinion in March of this year
(2000). Paragraphs 46 and 47 of appellant's request for
rehearing merely indicate that appellant's attempts to seek
the subsequent declarations "were unsuccessful". In paragraph
47 of the request for rehearing appellant urges the allowance
of claim 31 and its dependent claims "because these
indiviguals [sic] said it was too long ago to specifically
recall details about their involvement with the booth." On
their face, appellant's urgings do not convince us of any
error in our original opinion as to any subissue relating to
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007