Appeal No. 1997-2021
Application No. 08/500,231
the request is denied. Appellant has long lost any rights
accorded to him under the rules of practice to seek any relief
for any
alleged errors in these earlier decisions on appeal. Of those
first three appeals taken by appellant during earlier
prosecution of parent applications of this application, a
request for reconsid-eration was filed in a timely manner only
with respect to the second appeal in Appeal No. 92-1594 which
request was denied on June 18, 1992. We are unaware of any
provision of 37 CFR § 1.197 which permits appellant to seek a
reconsideration of prior appeals after the time set therefor
has expired.
We have considered appellant's positions set forth
between paragraphs 27 and 44 of the request for rehearing. It
is believed that the discussion at pages 4 and 5 of our
original opinion in effect basically still answers the urgings
for reconsideration set forth in the above noted paragraphs.
For emphasis, we repeat again the essence of the statement we
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007