Interference No. 104,192
Cragg v. Martin v. Fogarty
Patent Interference No. 104,192
_______________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER, LEE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Introduction
When this interference was declared on April 23, 1998,
current junior party Cragg was then senior party Goicoechea.
Because of the granting of a motion to correct inventorship in
related Interference No. 104,083 for application 08/461,402,
the same application that is involved in this interference,
co-inventors George Goicoechea, John Hudson, and Claude Mialhe
were deleted and the only remaining inventors in that
application are Andrew H. Cragg and Michael D. Dake. Thus,
party Goicoechea became party Cragg. Any reference to party
Goicoechea should be understood as a reference to party Cragg.
A decision on the parties’ preliminary motions was
rendered on February 11, 2000 (Paper No. 108), after which
party Fogarty filed a miscellaneous motion (Paper No. 112) for
leave to file, out of time, a preliminary motion 12 to attack
the benefit accorded party Cragg of European Applications
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007