Appeal No. 2000-0034 Application 08/473,634 Rejection of claim 33 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over Mundt Mundt discloses a method for decomposing a chemical compound in a reaction chamber (18) which contains 1) a tubular reactive fibrous mesh (74) which interacts, preferably by chemical reaction, with the chemical compound, 2) a tubular effluent condensation element (76), and 3) a hollow cylindrical tube (80) which preferably is made of quartz or aluminum and serves as a waveguide for electromagnetic radiation used to decompose the chemical compound (col. 3, lines 19-33; col. 7, lines 1-2 and 22-53; col. 8, lines 12-31). The examiner argues that Mundt’s gas flow is restricted since it is delivered via a pipe of finite or limited diameter (answer, page 6). The appellants’ claim 33, however, does not merely require that the gas flow is restricted but, rather, requires that it is restricted into a portion of the reaction chamber. Mundt indicates that the gas flow is to be unrestricted (col. 7, line 54), and Mundt’s does not 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007