Ex Parte EDLINGER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0038                                                        
          Application 08/751,369                                                      


                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a                 
          process for making an optical waveguide.  Claim 10 is                       
          illustrative:                                                               
               10. A process for the production of an optical waveguide,              
          comprising the steps of:                                                    
               (a) shaping a substrate consisting essentially of organic              
          material only;                                                              
               (b) applying at least one intermediate layer by a vacuum               
          coating process, onto the substrate; and                                    
               (c) applying a waveguide layer by means of a reactive                  
          physical vapor deposition (PVD) process, onto the intermediate              
          layer, the reactive physical vapor deposition process being                 
          reactive DC sputtering.                                                     

                                    THE REFERENCE                                     
          Heming et al. (Heming)          5,369,722          Nov. 29, 1994            
          (filed Sep. 18, 1992)                                                       
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 10-12, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23-34, 36-41, 43 and 44 stand            
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Heming.           
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the rejection of claims 10-12, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23-           
          34, 37, 38, 40, 41, 43 and 44, and reverse the rejection of                 
          claims 36 and 39.                                                           


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007