Appeal No. 2000-0179
Application No. 08/923,774
Dunkley. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the examiner's4
rejection of claims 18-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 9-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH ) APPEALS
Senior Administrative Patent Judge
) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4In this regard, we note that, while Doty may have suggested attaching
a removable second seat external to the Sides shopping cart basket frame, the
seat attachment taught by Doty lacks "a rear wall having a top axle extending
between and pivotally mounted upon vertical support rods which extend upward
along opposite sides of said basket frame" as recited in claim 18.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007