The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YUKIO SATO, TSUTOMU OKADA and YAYOI ISHIBASHI ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0182 Application No. 08/831,327 ____________ HEARD: March 7, 2001 ____________ Before STAAB, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3/1, 4/1, 10/1, 11/1, 12/1 and 22. Claims 2, 3/2, 4/2, 5 to 9, 10/2, 11/2, 13 and 15 to 21 have been indicated as being drawn to allowable subject matter. Claim 14 has been canceled.1 We REVERSE and enter new rejections pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b). 1 Claims 1, 15 and 18 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007