Appeal No. 2000-0204 Application No. 08/512,068 Bolinger 3,721,419 Mar. 20, 1973 Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Bolinger. More particularly, the examiner has relied upon the embodiment of the wick holding element seen in Figure 8 of Bolinger, urging that element (36) is a candle wick holding grate comprising a base member (plate 42 and flange portions 58) with a plurality of apertures (60) formed in the base member and through each of which apertures a candle wick can be passed, and a plurality of grooves or notches (62) each of which can hold a candle wick after the wick has been passed through an aperture in the base member. The examiner further indicates with regard to the "whereby" clause of claim 13 that element (36) of Bolinger is inherently capable of being shipped with candles as a part of a shipping container. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we refer to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 26, mailed July 19, 1999) and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 25, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007