Appeal No. 2000-0204
Application No. 08/512,068
examiner that the differences in the intended use of the wick
holding element disclosed in Bolinger and appellant's wick
holding grate do not patentably distinguish the claimed wick
holding grate from the wick holding element of Bolinger.
For the above reasons, we will sustain the examiner's
rejection of claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Bolinger, and the decision of the examiner is,
accordingly, affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
IAN A. CALVERT )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007