The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 51 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte TAKESHI SANO, ALEXANDER N. GLAZER and CHARLES R. CANTOR ___________ Appeal No. 2000-06301 Application No. 07/780,717 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 39 through 45, 47 through 54, 56 through 58, 60 through 65 and 68.2 1Application for patent filed October 21, 1991. 2The final rejection of claims 66 and 67, also pending in the application, was not carried through to the Examiner’s Answer, thus claims 66 and 67 are not the subject of this appeal. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007