Ex parte SANO et al. - Page 1





                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                              
                                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                 
                                                                                                                   Paper No. 51                                     

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                  
                                                                         __________                                                                                 
                                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                  
                                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                   
                                                                         __________                                                                                 
                                                                           Ex parte                                                                                 
                                                  TAKESHI SANO, ALEXANDER N. GLAZER                                                                                 
                                                             and CHARLES R. CANTOR                                                                                  
                                                                        ___________                                                                                 
                                                                 Appeal No. 2000-06301                                                                              
                                                              Application No. 07/780,717                                                                            
                                                                         __________                                                                                 
                                                                          ON BRIEF                                                                                  
                                                                         __________                                                                                 
                   Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
                   SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                           
                                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                  
                            This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims                                                   
                   39 through 45, 47 through 54, 56 through 58, 60 through 65 and 68.2                                                                              


                            1Application for patent filed October 21, 1991.                                                                                         
                            2The final rejection of claims 66 and 67, also pending in the application, was not                                                      
                   carried through to the Examiner’s Answer,  thus claims 66 and 67 are not the subject of this                                                     
                   appeal.                                                                                                                                          
                                                                                 1                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007