Appeal No. 2000-0630 Application No. 07/780,717 In our judgment, the only reason or suggestion to modify the references in the manner proposed by the examiner comes from appellants’ specification. Accordingly, we find that the examiner’s initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness has not been met, and all three of the rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are reversed. REVERSED ) Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Douglas W. Robinson ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007