Ex parte AKIBA - Page 1




         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was             
         not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                
         the Board.                                                                 
                                                        Paper No. 30                
                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    __________                                      
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                               Ex parte MASARU AKIBA                                
                                    __________                                      
                               Appeal No. 2000-0693                                 
                              Application 08/845,282                                
                                    ___________                                     
                             HEARD: November 28, 2000                               
                                    ___________                                     

         Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.               
         STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
              This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection              
         of claims 1-59, all the claims then pending in the                         
         application.  Subsequent to the final rejection, appellant                 
         filed an amendment seeking to cancel claims 1-3, 5-7, 16, 20               
         and 58, and to make minor changes to claims 44, 45, and 52,                
         which amendment was entered by the examiner (see the advisory              
         letter mailed July 23, 1999 (Paper No. 22)).  Accordingly,                 



                                         1                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007