Appeal No. 2000-0693 Application 08/845,282 arrangement shown in Figure 4 where the recessed and protruded portions are formed on the film layer applied to the tubular member. The examiner should consider whether there is proper descriptive support in the disclosure as originally filed for the subject matter of claims 10 and 21, as well as the claims that depend therefrom. If descriptive support for the subject matter of any such claim is found to be lacking, the examiner should enter a rejection thereof under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Summary The rejection of claims 4, 8-15, 17-19 and 21-57 is reversed on the merits. The rejection of claim 59 is reversed on procedural grounds. Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), a new rejection of claim 59 has been made. Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(a), this case is remanded to the examiner for the reason noted above. This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007