Appeal No. 00-0910 Application No. 08/821,176 patent are both related to and based upon provisional application No. 60/003,934, filed September 15, 1995. The sole reference relied upon by the examiner in the final rejection is: Scharboneau et al. (Scharboneau) 5,692,770 Dec. 2, 1997 (filing date Oct. 24, 1995) Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Scharboneau. Claims 1-11 stand further rejected under the judicially created doctrine of double patenting over the claims of Scharboneau “since the [appealed] claims, if allowed, would improperly extend the ‘right to exclude’ already granted in the patent” (answer, page 3). Reference is made to appellants’ main, supplemental and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 11, 17 and 22) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 20) for the respective positions of appellants and the examiner regarding the merits of these rejections. The Double Patenting Rejection 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007