Appeal No. 2000-1349
Application No. 08/475,026
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Giladi in view of
Cepparo and Kishi is reversed.
5. The examiner’s decision to reject claim 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Giladi in view of
Cepparo and Harrison is affirmed.
6. The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 15 and
17-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Giladi in
view of Martin is reversed.
7. The examiner’s decision to reject claims 2-5, 8-10
and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Giladi in
view of Martin and Kishi is reversed.
8. The examiner’s decision to reject claim 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Giladi in view of
Martin and Harrison is reversed.
In addition, new rejections of claims 5, 17 and 19
have been introduced pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).
In addition to affirming the examiner's rejection of
one or more claims, this decision contains new grounds of
rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective
Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131,
53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark
Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37 CFR § 1.196(b)
21
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007