Ex parte NIELSEN - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication                         
                                         and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                               

                                                                                           Paper No. 26                           
                                                                                                                                 
                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                       _____________                                                              
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                       _____________                                                              
                                                 Ex parte JAKOB NIELSEN                                                           
                                                       _____________                                                              
                                                    Appeal No. 2000-1377                                                          
                                                 Application No. 08/628,415                                                       
                                                       ______________                                                             
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                      _______________                                                             
               Before THOMAS, KRASS,  and LALL,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
               KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                

                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                      This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 9, 10, 18, 19 and                        
               27.   Claims 2-8, 11-17 and 20-26 have been allowed by the examiner.                                               
                      The invention is directed to electronic mail (e-mail).  More particularly, a sender of                      
               e-mail is permitted to find a new e-mail address of a recipient when the sender                                    





                                                                1                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007