Ex parte ESTINTO - Page 8




              Appeal No. 2000-1461                                                                                           
              Application No. 08/716,905                                                                                     

              on a satellite wherein the wideband RF signal is generated by modulating the output of a PN                    
              sequence generator.  There is no suggestion in any of the applied references for employing                     
              any wideband teaching that Kroeger may have to Thomas                                                          
              and/or Tarantino which are not concerned with wideband RF signals.  Moreover, while                            
              Thomas discloses a distortion analyzer 24, that analyzer measures power level of the third                     
              order intermodulation product to determine the power level of the input signal to the                          
              transponder 20 [see column 4, lines 22-42, of Thomas] and there is no suggestion in                            
              Thomas that distortion in satellite RF transponders, in the manner claimed, is contemplated                    
              by Thomas, or any of the other applied references.                                                             
                      The “wideband RF signal” is part of each of the instant claims and it is important that                
              such wideband periodic RF signal is transmitted to the transponders on the satellite,                          
              received at the transponder which then retransmits the wideband RF signals and said relayed                    
              wideband RF signals are then downconverted as claimed.  There is absolutely no disclosure                      
              or suggestion of these interrelated elements and/or steps in the combination of applied                        
              references and the examiner has not convinced us otherwise.                                                    






                      The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                        

                                                             8                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007