The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MARTIN P. HAGEMAN and THOMAS J. PALUS ____________ Appeal No. 2000-1514 Application No. 09/038,450 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STAAB, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 12, 14 to 17, 19 and 20. Claims 13, 18, 21 and 22 have been objected to as depending from a non- allowed claim. No claim has been canceled. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007