Ex parte PISHEVAR - Page 1





                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                       
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                                                                                        Paper No. 16                     

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                     __________                                                          
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     __________                                                          
                                          Ex parte SHERVIN K. PISHEVAR                                                   
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No.  2000-1919                                                    
                                              Application No. 08/831,993                                                 
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
                 Before ROBINSON, MILLS, and GRIMES,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
                 GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                           
                 final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-12, and 14-20, all of the claims remaining.  Claim                    
                 1 is representative and reads as follows:                                                               
                        1.      A method for inhibiting the development of a parasite in a                               
                 erythrocyte, said method comprising the step of contacting the erythrocyte,                             
                 infected with an intracellular parasite, with a magainin, PGLa or XPF peptide                           
                 under conditions whereby the development of said parasite in said erythrocyte is                        
                 inhibited.                                                                                              








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007