Ex parte HAMISCH, JR. et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 17         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                  Ex parte PAUL H. HAMISCH, JR. and JOHN D. MISTYURIK                 
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-2256                                 
                              Application No. 09/069,377                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: NOVEMBER 27, 2001                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 34                
          and 35.  Claim 36, the only other claim remaining in the                    
          application, stands allowed.                                                


               Appellants' invention pertains to an ink ribbon                        
          cartridge.  A basic understanding of the invention can be                   
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 34, a copy of which               
          appears in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 9).                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007