Appeal No. 2000-2256
Application No. 09/069,377
housing 10 when understood in light of appellants' teaching,
as explained above. Since the content of claim 34 is not
readable on the Harvey document, claim 34 and claim 35
dependent thereon are not anticipated under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b).
In summary, this panel of the board has not sustained the
anticipation rejection on appeal.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007