The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent
of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT K. DEHAVEN and
JAMES F. WENZEL
__________
Appeal No. 2000-2294
Application 08/511,425
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the Examiner’s
stated final rejection of claims 59-78, which are the only
claims remaining in the application. Claims 1-58 have been 1
1We point out that a review of the record reveals that,
through apparent misnumbering of the claims, there is no claim
63 or claim 64, although neither Appellants nor the Examiner
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007