Ex parte CALVO et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 2001-0700                                                        
          Application 09/154,938                                                      


          would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to               
          a person having ordinary skill in the art.  We shall therefore              
          sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 1,              
          3, 6 and 10.                                                                


                                      SUMMARY                                         


               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 3, 6 and              
          10 is affirmed.                                                             


               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 


                                    AFFIRMED                                          





                         LAWRENCE J. STAAB             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              

                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007