Appeal No. 2001-1504 Application 08/618,263 Lance, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a self-adjusting locking wrench tool 100 (see Figures 16 and 17) having a stationary jaw and a movable jaw. As best shown in the partially cutaway side view illustrated in Figure 16, the stationary jaw defines a recess which receives a flat portion of the movable jaw. With implied reference to tool 100, the examiner (see page 3 in the answer) has determined that Lance teaches or would have suggested all of the limitations in claim 16 except for those pertaining to the laminated construction of the stationary and movable jaws. This determination is reasonable on its face and has not been disputed by the appellant. Emmett discloses a slidable jaw wrench wherein each of jaws J and J’ has a laminated construction (see column 2, lines 11 through 32). In proposing to combine Lance and Emmett to reject claim 16, the examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art “to form the jaws of Lance as laminated with a recess between the outer laminae of the fixed 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007