Appeal No. 2001-1504
Application 08/618,263
matter recited in claim 16 and the prior art are such that the
subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time
the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in
the art. Accordingly, we shall sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejections of claim 16 and claims 19 and 20 which
depend therefrom.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 16, 19 and
20 is affirmed.
AFFIRMED
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007