Patent Interference No. 103,548
information, if not provided, which would have raised questions about the identity of the
alleged indolines and which might have helped Lagrange meet their burden in establishing
inadmissible hearsay.
Konrad Motion to Suppress Evidence
Konrad filed a motion to suppress evidence under 37 CFR § 1.656(h) (paper no.
93, filed January 30, 1998). Konrad seeks to suppress 1) Lagrange Exhibit A to
Konrad's Preliminary Statement and 2) Cotteret Declarations I-V. Lagrange filed an
opposition to this motion (paper no. 98; filed February 27, 1998) to which Konrad filed a
reply (paper no. 104; March 20, 1998).
The motion is dismissed to the extent that it seeks to suppress Lagrange Exhibit A
because we have not relied on this exhibit in our decision.
The motion is moot with respect to suppressing the Cotteret declarations. The
Cotteret declarations were considered with respect to Lagrange's motions but the motions
were nevertheless denied.
73
Page: Previous 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007