Patent Interference No. 103,548
JUDGMENT
Having decided all the issues properly raised by the parties in their briefs, we
now enter judgment in this interference pursuant to our authority under 37 C.F.R. §
1.658(a).
With respect to the motions, we hold the following:
Lagrange Preliminary Motion 2 - Denied
Lagrange Preliminary Motion 3 - Denied
Lagrange Motion to Suppress - Dismissed
Konrad Preliminary Motion 5 - Granted
Konrad Preliminary Motion 7 - Granted
Konrad Preliminary Motion 8 - Moot
Konrad Motion to Suppress - Dismissed/Moot
Upon consideration of the record, and for the reasons given herein, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 is awarded against junior
party, Lagrange.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 is awarded in favor
of senior party, Konrad.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2 is awarded against
junior party, Lagrange.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2 is awarded in favor
of senior party, Konrad.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 3 is awarded against
junior party, Lagrange.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 3 is awarded in favor
of senior party, Konrad.
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences, junior party Lagrange is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-
74
Page: Previous 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007