Interference 103,685
F. Conclusion
It is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2, the
sole count in this interference, is awarded against party JOHN R.
HOLSTEN and NIGEL E. NEELEY;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, party JOHN R. HOLSTEN and NIGEL
E. NEELEY, is not entitled to a patent containing Claims 1-39
(corresponding to Count 2) of U.S. Patent 5,207803, granted
May 4, 1993, based on Application 07/589,919, filed September 28,
1990; and
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, party JOHN R. HOLSTEN and NIGEL
E. NEELEY, is not entitled to a patent containing Claims 1, 3-12,
15-19, 23, 24, 26-32, 35-40, 43, 45-49 and 52 (corresponding to
Count 2) of U.S. Application 08/025,979, filed March 3, 1993.
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement and it has not
already been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c)
and 37 CFR § 1.661; and
-67-
Page: Previous 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007