KALFAS et al. V. WEAVER et al. V. WEAVER et al. V. ROWLAND et al. - Page 22





             Exhibit 2032 is a letter dated 10 January 1994 to Dr.                  
        Anthony Bohorfoush, M.D. of Froedtert Memorial in Milwaukee,                
        Wisconsin from Chris Rowland. Exhibit 2033 is entitled                      
        IlUltratome XLý Evaluation" and appears to be an evaluation form            
        of an IlUltratome XL."                                                      
             Apparently, Rowland submits the letter and the evaluation              
        form as proof of the truth of the matter asserted. No one                   
        testified as to what the letter or the evaluation form represent.           
        Thus, Rowland is relying on the exhibits themselves to support              
        the truth of the assertion. In that light, the letter and                   
        evaluation form should not be considered, since both are                    
        inadmissible hearsay. For these reasons alone, Rowland has                  
        failed to sufficiently demonstrate by a preponderance of the                
        evidence that it reduced the invention of the count to practice             
        on 8 February 1994.                                                         
             Alternatively, we have considered the letter and evaluation            
        form in support of Rowland's argument. However, for reasons                 
        discussed below, we are not persuaded that the letter and/or the            
        evaluation form demonstrate that the subject matter of the count            
        was actually reduced to practice.                                           
             It is not clear from the evaluation form that the device               


        clarify the replacement of references to "RR 2911 with "Ex. 2033"           
        (Paper 124). However, that brief will not and has not been                  
        considered, since Rowland has made alterations beyond deleting              
        references to "RR 2911 to the last two pages, contrary to its               
        statement that the brief is identical to its original.                      
                                       22                                           







Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007