prejudicial to the administration of justice in this
interference. See Standing Cmte. on Discipline v. Yagman,
55 F.3d 1430 (9th Cir. 1995) (reversing sanctions but noting the
potential harm to the administration of justice when counsel
engage in conduct hostile to a presiding judge). Counsel will
not be permitted to engage in this sort of misconduct.
D. Judgment
Upon consideration of the record, it is
ORDERED that summary judgment is entered against the
junior party FRANK SEVER, JR. 37 CFR § 1.617.
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1
(Paper 1 at 5) is awarded against junior party FRANK SEVER, JR.
35 U.S.C. § 102(g).
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party FRANK SEVER, JR. is
not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-7 (corresponding to
Count 1) of application 09/340,437, filed 28 June 1999. 35
U.S.C. § 102(g).
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made
of record in files of SEVER application 09/340,437, and GLICKMAN
U.S. Patent 5,897,533.
15
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007