Appeal No. 1996-0478 Application No. 08/171,769 Generally, an obviousness-type double patenting analysis entails two steps. First, as a matter of law, a court construes the claim in the earlier patent and the claim in the later patent and determines the differences. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Gypsum Co., 195 F.3d 1322, 1326, 52 USPQ2d 1590, 1593 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Second, the court determines whether the differences in subject matter between the two claims render the claims patentably distinct. Id. at 1327, 52 USPQ2d at 1595. A later claim that is not patentably distinct from an earlier claim in a commonly owned patent is invalid for obvious-type double patenting. In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 1431, 46 USPQ2d 1226, 1229 (Fed. Cir. 1998). Here, appellant argues that the obvious-type (non-statutory) double patenting rejection required a comparison of the issued claims with the pending claims. (See brief at page 5.) We agree with appellant. Appellant argues that when a comparison of the claimed invention is made with the claims of the ‘044 patent, the pending claims are patentably distinct from those of the ‘044 patent. (See brief at page 9.) We agree with appellant. Appellant argues that each of the independent claims requires that the gate insulating layer extend beyond the edge of the gate electrode such that the exposure to light irradiation is carried out through the part of the gate insulating layer located outside the gate electrode. (See brief at page 9.) We note that the language of independent claims 24 and 27 does not specifically recite forming the gate insulating layer to extend beyond the gate electrode. When asked at the oral hearing, appellant’s representative argued that the “wherein clause” of claims 24 and 27 clearly recites that the irradiation is carried out through a part of the gate insulating layer thereby clearly setting forth that the gate insulating layer extends beyond the gate electrode over the source and drain regions. We agree with appellant. At the oral 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007