The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY M. CALVERT, PEHR E. PEHRSSON
and MARTIN C. PECKERAR
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1644
Application No. 07/933,147
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4 through 9,
15 and 16, which are all of the claims pending in the above-
identified application.
According to appellants (Brief, page 4), “[the] claims
stand or fall together.” Therefore, for purposes of this
appeal, we need only consider the propriety of the examiner’s
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007